
© 2025 Onward. All rights reserved.
Designed by BX Studio

If you want a digital marketing agency to move revenue (not just “make ads”), ask questions that prove three things: (1) how they measure business outcomes, (2) how they operate week to week, and (3) how they earn the right to scale spend. Most agency answers sound good while hiding weak attribution, vague accountability, or incentives that reward bigger budgets over better decisions.
Most buyers assume the failure mode is “they were bad at ads.” That happens, but it is usually not the first domino.
Domino 1: Bad measurement and fuzzy accountability.
Privacy changes and platform limitations mean attribution is never perfect, so the real question is whether the agency has a plan when the data is messy.
Domino 2: Misaligned incentives.
A pricing model can quietly shape behavior. If the agency earns more by spending more, you want extra proof they will protect profit, not just volume.
Domino 3: Slow operating tempo.
If your business moves weekly but the agency reports monthly, you lose compounding. A monthly deck is not a growth system.
Onward’s bias is simple: a good agency builds truth (data), buys growth (media), and improves outcomes (creative + CRO) as one system. That is why the best pre-sign questions are the ones that expose the system, not the pitch.
One client, Danny Freed (CEO, Blueprint), put it plainly: “Our data sources are a little messy… The dashboard is really helpful, because Onward and their team have made that the single source of truth.”
Why it matters: It forces a finish line. It also reveals vanity metrics.
A strong answer includes:
Why it matters: There will be gaps. The question is whether they know what to do next.
A strong answer includes:
Why it matters: This reveals whether they have a repeatable process and real time-to-value.
A strong answer includes:
Why it matters: Many agencies sell senior strategy and deliver junior execution.
A strong answer includes:
Why it matters: Testing is the engine. Without it, you get random activity.
A strong answer includes:
Why it matters: Performance rarely fails because of targeting alone.
A strong answer includes:
Why it matters: Most teams live across ad platforms, analytics, CRM, and billing.
A strong answer includes:
Why it matters: Lock-in is real. You should never be trapped.
A strong answer includes:
1) Measurement truth
Can they connect spend to business outcomes, and explain limitations without hand-waving?
2) Operating cadence
Do they move as fast as you do? Will you see weekly decisions, not monthly decks?
3) Incentive alignment
Does pricing reward good decisions, or reward bigger budgets?
Ask questions that force specifics on measurement, cadence, and incentives.
Start with “How do you tie spend to revenue?” and “What will I see in the first 2–4 weeks?”
If they cannot answer clearly, do not sign.
You should see early signal in 30–60 days, and stronger clarity by 90 days, assuming tracking is in place and you can ship creative.
Onward clients describe knowing it was working within the first month or two, then scaling spend gradually.
It depends, but it often misaligns incentives once you have momentum.
A client perspective is that percent-of-spend can look like “shared risk,” but agencies can still win even if performance is average.
Fixed, predictable pricing can reduce that conflict.
At minimum, spend, conversion volume, CAC or payback proxy, and what changed since last week.
The best agencies also report what they learned and what they will test next.
If you are still looking at slides, you are already behind.
It is one place where performance is reconciled across platforms and tied to business outcomes. Clients describe it as the place they go for cohorts, cost per conversion, and revenue outcomes. It reduces debates and speeds up decisions.